When Surprise Sounds Like Doubt

The Drift - Essay 15

A reflection on judging people based on whether they're behaving the way we expected them to.

Someone reached out to me with a situation that felt familiar.

They work on a well-functioning team. Clear roles. Good collaboration. Strong results. By every reasonable measure, things are working.

And yet.

Some of the less positive feedback isn't arriving directly. It's surfacing elsewhere.

Casual remarks. Passing observations. Comments that seem harmless on their own but somehow find their way back.

Things like:

"Oh, that's different."

"Interesting approach."

"I wouldn't have expected that."

 Not criticism. Not questions. Just enough surprise to linger.

Because the work itself isn't being challenged. The decisions aren't being challenged. The outcomes aren't being challenged.

What's being challenged is an expectation.

 An idea of who someone is supposed to be. How they're supposed to think. What they're supposed to contribute.

What "makes sense" coming from them.

The person who shared this story couldn't point to a specific problem that needed solving.

There was no formal concern. No direct conversation. Just a growing sense that being unexpected had somehow become a liability.

I wondered whether we sometimes confuse familiarity with credibility.

We tell ourselves we're evaluating ideas on their merits. But often, we're evaluating whether they arrived from the person we expected to hear them from.

Whether they fit the version of someone we've already created in our heads.

When they do, we call them credible. When they don't, we start asking different questions.

Not because the idea is weaker. Because it feels unfamiliar.

That's what makes these moments so difficult. There's no accusation to answer. No mistake to correct. No obvious conflict to resolve.

Just a subtle shift in how someone is received.

The more I thought about it, the less I thought it was about feedback.

It felt like something else.

A reminder that we often believe we're judging people based on what they do.

But sometimes we're judging them based on whether they're behaving the way we expected them to.

We call it credibility. But sometimes it's really familiarity. And the two are easier to confuse than we'd like to admit.

 Maybe that's why being understood can feel harder than being right.

Here’s where to go next:

After an Accusation You Didn’t Deserve

The Drift is part of a broader ecosystem: Quick Wins offers everyday practice, and the AI Toolkit supports the practical tools communicators use and the AI Change Management Plan supports workplace adoption. Together, they outline the realities of modern communication work.

Previous
Previous

What You and Your Team Need to Learn

Next
Next

The Risks Communicators Need to Address